tirsdag 3. mars 2015

Senza



Senza stelle,
Senza te.
Senza luna
Non che Sole..
Senza sole non che il mondo
Grazie per mia vita, grazie per la tua vita .

Love



Love to our Parents is important to show:

I love my parents, I promise, I do!
I Love our beautiful Youth too, I Do, I do
Promise me and I promise you
Safety comes first and so do you

onsdag 18. februar 2015

Why did my history teacher lie?



History I learned in school that I now know for a fact is a lie

The myth that Columbus discovered America: Vikings vs Indians

America was discovered in 1492 because European were starting to get curious about the outside world thanks to the renaissance and enlightenment and European of the time just generally being the first smart people ever. Columbus named the people who already lived there Indians, presumably because he was being charmingly self-deprecating. 

The truth
Here’s what we know. A bunch of Vikings set up a successful colony in Greenland that lasted for 518 years (982-1500). To put that into perspective, the white European settlement currently known as the United States will need to wait until the year 2125 to match that longevity. The Vikings spent a good portion of that time sending expeditions down south to try to settle what they called vineland- which historian now believe was the east coast of north America. After spending a couple decades sneaking ashore to raid Vineland of its ample wood pulp, the Vikings made a go od settling in North America in 1005. After landing there with livestock, supplies and between 100 and 300 settlers, they set up the first successful European American colony. For two years. And then the Native Americans kicked their ass out of the country, shooting the head Viking in the heart with an arrow.
So the recap, the Vikings discovered America. They were camping off the coast of America, And had every reason to settle America for about 500 years. Despite being the biggest badasses in European history, one tangle with the natives was enough to convince the Vikings that settling America wasn’t worth the trouble. If you think the pilgrims would have fared any better that the Vikings against an East coast chock-full of Native Americans, you ether don’t know what a Viking is or you’re placing entirely too much stock in the strategic importance of having belt buckles on your shoes.

If the Indians had been at full strength in 1640, white people might still be sneaking onto the east coast to steal wood pulp. That’s as far as Vikings got in 500 years, and they were sailing from much closer that Europe and desperately needed the resources – the two competing theories for why the Viking settlements on Greenland eventually died out are lack of resources and getting killed by natives – and, perhaps most importantly they were goddamned Vikings
So why did you history teacher tell a lie?

A reminder!









mandag 16. februar 2015

the view of the western media

Yesterday I was reading the newspaper and main headings was the  "Terror in Denmark». Just a few weeks ago it was the terror in France. I wonder why it says never headlines like "atteist activist  killed three young Muslimeen" or "Deadly attack On Nigeria Bus station"

"Once again a Jew killed in Europe, once again is a synagogue attack. And now it happens in Scandinavia. This time must not Jews be alone "  was written in an articel


I get sad over th unequal treatment of cultures and religions. Why do I read and I hear only that Jews are attacked by Muslims. Why write VG, Dagbladet aftenposten ect, writes several  articles about a Jew who has been killed but have not mentioned what happened on the other side of the globe? - I am disgusted by how the Norwegian media portrays and gives us only the news they think is relevant. This is not only in Norway, but in fact almost the entire West and the United States, we are made blind to the truth.
In December in Sweden were several mosques burned and several injured. Night of January 1 was attempted burned a mosque in Uppsala. In Norway, several daily harassed because they are Muslims. Once again I see hatred in my streets. This time we are not alone my brothers and sisters
, we are all together. 


 
 

torsdag 5. februar 2015

Indigo child

                           
                              Indigo child



What are Indigo Children?

Lately many of my friends have asked me who are the Indigo Children? I been wondering how I could break it down in the easiest way. So I started looking after example’s in people. “Indigo Children” is a label like many others. But the word also describe someone different than others. I found two different definitions of the word Indigo Children –

“children with “Indigo” auras, that usually differ from modern society. They are prone to ADD and ADHD diagnoses, however, blind mothers might claim their ADHD as an Indigo to avoid the fact that their child is less than perfect and try to excuse him from making trouble. 

The other definitions: 

“Indigo child – a Peron, usually a teenager or young adult who does not and cannot comply it modern society, who is highly spiritually and is believed to have come here in this time to aid in the transition of the energies of earth in the near future. They tend to be androgynous and have psychic powers, such as clairvoyance. The youngest ae Crystal children witch are about seven and under, but can be older”



 History:
 The term indigo child comes from psychic Nancy Ann Tappe, who classifield peoples personalities according to the hue of their auras.





- more to come